1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Lexus GS
To start off, 2006 Lexus GS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2006 Lexus GS. (217 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Lexus GS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lexus GS. (294 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lexus GS.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Lexus GS | |
Make | Cadillac | Lexus |
Model | 62 | GS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |