1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 311 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | 62 | Mark LT |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 114 L |