1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac DTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac DTS. (275 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac DTS.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac DTS. (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | 62 | DTS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |