1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Croma. (146 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 615 kg more than 2008 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2008 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2008 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Croma |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 62 L |