1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Honda Fit
To start off, 2008 Honda Fit is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2008 Honda Fit. (109 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1038 kg more than 2008 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda Fit. (142 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | Fit |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 41 L |
