1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (391 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 507 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 88 L |