1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1064 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Ford Ka | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Ka |
Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |