1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2009 Mazda B4000 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 945 kg more than 2009 Mazda B4000.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda B4000 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda B4000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | B4000 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4034 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 74 L |