1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |