1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 418 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2009 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 117 L |