1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1042 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2010 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2010 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | 62 | C3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 72 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1158 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |