1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Stilo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 860 kg more than 2010 Fiat Stilo.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2010 Fiat Stilo has manual transmission. 2010 Fiat Stilo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |