1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze

To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 186 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.

Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: