1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2010 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Ridgeline (247 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 82 kg more than 2010 Honda Ridgeline.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Honda Ridgeline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | Ridgeline |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 42 L |
