1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 732 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Commander |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 358 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |