1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 550 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | 62 | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 269 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2845 mm |
