1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 18 kg more than 2010 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |