1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 408. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 436 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
Model | 62 | 408 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |