1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. (157 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 72 kg more than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2053 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1925 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 91 L |