1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2010 Toyota Highlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4785 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2789 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 65 L |
