1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Ford Flex
To start off, 2011 Ford Flex is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 97 kg more than 2011 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Ford Flex | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Flex |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |