1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2011 Saab 05-Sep. (220 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Saab 05-Sep.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Saab 05-Sep. (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Saab 05-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | 62 | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |