1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Toyota Sequoia

To start off, 2011 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 474 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 2011 Toyota Sequoia
Make Cadillac Toyota
Model 62 Sequoia
Year Released 1959 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6382 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 381 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2125 kg 2599 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 5210 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 2029 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 3099 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 100 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]