1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 920 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2012 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2012 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |