1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Ford Focus
To start off, 2013 Ford Focus is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2013 Ford Focus. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 753 kg more than 2013 Ford Focus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Focus. (198 Nm @ 4450 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Focus. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Focus has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Focus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Ford Focus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Focus |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4450 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2045 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
