1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 685 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2013 Lotus Evora has manual transmission. 2013 Lotus Evora will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | 62 | Evora |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2047 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
