1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL has manual transmission. 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | CL |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5106 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2139 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2955 mm |