1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 840 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |