1959 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1966 Volvo 144 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Biarritz (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Biarritz | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Biarritz | 144 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |