1959 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1983 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1983 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Biarritz (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1445 kg more than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Biarritz | 1983 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | Biarritz | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 47 L |