1959 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1617 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac Biarritz | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | Biarritz | Emme |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 260 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2770 mm |
