1959 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Biarritz (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Biarritz | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Biarritz | Tracker |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2210 mm |