1959 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML (232 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Biarritz | 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Biarritz | ML |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |