1959 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 1959 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Brougham | 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Brougham | 300 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6380 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2390 mm |