1959 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1973 Renault 12
To start off, 1973 Renault 12 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1973 Renault 12. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1973 Renault 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1973 Renault 12. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Renault 12, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Brougham | 1973 Renault 12 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Brougham | 12 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6380 cc | 1288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |