1959 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1959 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Brougham | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | E-350 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6380 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |