1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1951 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1959 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1192 kg more than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1951 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | DeVille | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 37 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1580 mm |
