1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1952 Skoda 1200
To start off, 1959 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1952 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Skoda 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1952 Skoda 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1952 Skoda 1200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | DeVille | 1200 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6380 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2690 mm |