1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6380 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2210 mm |
