1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | DeVille | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6380 cc | 1116 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2460 mm |