1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1982 Ford Telstar is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Telstar |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |