1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 935 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | Apollo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6380 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |