1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Citroen XM
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 830 kg more than 1996 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Citroen XM | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | DeVille | XM |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2760 mm |