1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Taurus (238 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. (198 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 624 kg more than 1996 Ford Taurus.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 238 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1860 mm |
