1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. (198 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 72 kg more than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac DeVille | 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | DeVille | ML |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 288 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 2214 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1850 mm |
