1959 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2002 Fiat Stilo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (102 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 992 kg more than 2002 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | DeVille | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1790 mm |
