1959 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 1964 DKW Munga is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Eldorado (345 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Eldorado | 1964 DKW Munga | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Eldorado | Munga |
Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 31 L |