1959 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Eldorado (345 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1245 kg more than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac Eldorado | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Cadillac | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Eldorado | Murena |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2440 mm |
