1959 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 915 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1959 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac Eldorado | 2003 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Eldorado | Sebring |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2640 mm |