1959 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2002 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood. (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood weights approximately 912 kg more than 2002 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Mustang. (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Mustang. 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac Fleetwood will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac Fleetwood 2002 Ford Mustang
Make Cadillac Ford
Model Fleetwood Mustang
Year Released 1959 2002
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6382 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 325 HP 385 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 529 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2572 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 6160 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 2060 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 3810 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]